What You Should Know About Method Acting

Uncategorized

Method acting is considered the most difficult to teach and to learn. Its main characteristic is that it lacks any specific or technical approach to acting. It is what the supporters of this type of acting refer to as the alternative to the clich├ęd, unrealistic, and so-called rubber-stamp acting. In other words, it is based on realism and realistic emotions.

Because there are many versions of the method of acting the exact approach depends on the particular version, which can include such practices as substitution acting or what is called emotional memory.

Sanford Meisner, who was another Group Theater pioneer, taught a closely related form of method acting. He differed from Strasberg’s emotional memory theory and taught one that revolved around “fully immersing oneself in the moment of a character, and experiencing all sensations as the character would.”

Stella Adler had another approach to method acting. Her technique is based on the idea that an actor must not use memories from their own past to bring up emotion, but instead use circumstances from their own imagination. She also taught that action was very important. It wasn’t so much what we said but what we did while we said it.

Contemporary acting teachers, names like Jason Bennett, combine many of the acting theories of the last generation of acting teachers. These methods utilize a number of devices such as using the actor’s imagination, calling on his or her life experiences to dive into the part and various forms of psychology where actors are taught to imagine what a person would psychologically do when confronted with the situation in the script. For example, how would a person truly react if another person pulled a gun on them and was ready to shoot them? What terror would they feel? From that, the actor tries to convey that psychological terror in the performance.

Bennett also worked on what is called the use of human archetypes. Archetype work is rooted in Jungian Psychology and in the works of Michael Chekhov. Chekhov was very closely associated with Stanislavski. As Chekov’s work evolved, he broke away from Stanislavski, Strasberg, and the original members of The Group. Many believe that later in his life, Stanislavski began to recognize that Chekov’s work was very important in developing modern acting theory.

Even though method acting is very hard to teach and even harder to learn, it is still regarded as the most realistic form of acting that there is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *